2/ Distributed teams have been a conversation for a while, but the impulse to keep things geo organized around the hubs was strong. Whether it's the global nature of the blockchain space or simply the no-time-to-wait push for talent, that geographic constraint feels broken.
— Nathaniel Whittemore (@nlw) July 3, 2018
4/ Importantly though, the break in hegemony of tech hubs coincides with a larger shift in talent specialization. If you’re a top tier content producer, for example, you want to be able to produce content over and over, not also have to be amazing at performance marketing.
— Nathaniel Whittemore (@nlw) July 3, 2018
6/ My bet is we’re headed towards small core teams serving as stewards of the brand and organizers of large distributed networks of specialist contributors. This will also be the case for other parts of the org, although where the boundaries of inside and outside lay may vary.
— Nathaniel Whittemore (@nlw) July 3, 2018
8/ Of course, in reality, there will be multiple models. @ricburton has written eloquently on why @Balance_io now has a more complex relationship with remote https://t.co/Jr1spcY2lM
— Nathaniel Whittemore (@nlw) July 3, 2018
10/ @_jillruth's ‘Free Company’ is effectively a proposal for one version of how those relationships might work and specifically how networks of talent might organize themselves to better contribute to protocols. Check it out for more on this. https://t.co/s38AHgphWg
— Nathaniel Whittemore (@nlw) July 3, 2018
Comments are closed